Recover rule by rule recertification #3882
Conversation
|
| SELECT INTO t_rule_created rule_metadata.rule_created | ||
| FROM rule | ||
| LEFT JOIN rule_metadata ON (rule.rule_uid=rule_metadata.rule_uid AND rule.dev_id=rule_metadata.dev_id) | ||
| LEFT JOIN rule_metadata ON (rule.rule_uid=rule_metadata.rule_uid) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I guess we need to add mgm_id here (when #3885 is merged).
| delete_recertification( | ||
| where: { | ||
| owner_id: { _eq: $ownerId } | ||
| rule_metadatum: { device: { mgm_id: { _eq: $mgmId } } } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I guess we need to add mgm_id here (when #3885 is merged).
| FROM view_rule_with_owner | ||
| LEFT JOIN rule USING (rule_id) | ||
| LEFT JOIN rule_metadata ON (rule.rule_uid=rule_metadata.rule_uid AND rule.dev_id=rule_metadata.dev_id) | ||
| LEFT JOIN rule_metadata ON (rule.rule_uid=rule_metadata.rule_uid) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I guess we need to add mgm_id here (when #3885 is merged).
| FROM view_rule_with_owner | ||
| LEFT JOIN rule USING (rule_id) | ||
| LEFT JOIN rule_metadata ON (rule.rule_uid=rule_metadata.rule_uid AND rule.dev_id=rule_metadata.dev_id) | ||
| LEFT JOIN rule_metadata ON (rule.rule_uid=rule_metadata.rule_uid) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I guess we need to add mgm_id here (when #3885 is merged).
| view_rule_with_owner V | ||
| LEFT JOIN rule R USING (rule_id) | ||
| LEFT JOIN rule_metadata M ON (R.rule_uid=M.rule_uid AND R.dev_id=M.dev_id) | ||
| LEFT JOIN rule_metadata M ON (R.rule_uid=M.rule_uid) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I guess we need to add mgm_id here (when #3885 is merged).
| view_rule_with_owner V | ||
| LEFT JOIN rule R USING (rule_id) | ||
| LEFT JOIN rule_metadata M ON (R.rule_uid=M.rule_uid AND R.dev_id=M.dev_id) | ||
| LEFT JOIN rule_metadata M ON (R.rule_uid=M.rule_uid) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I guess we need to add mgm_id here (when #3885 is merged).
|
|
||
| [JsonProperty("dev_id"), JsonPropertyName("dev_id")] | ||
| public int DeviceId { get; set; } | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I guess we need to add mgm_id here (when #3885 is merged).
I would also say we should merge #3885 first, since #3882 seems to depend on those changes. |
|
Throwing my 2 cents into the ring: I am kinda dependant on parts of #3882 being merged in so whichever way merges that in sooner rather than later would be awesome :) |
4 participants
No description provided.